Page 2 of 2

Posted: May 21st, 2007, 8:13 pm
by feaito
No problems here either Jon, thanks for the hard work you've put in!

:D :D :D

Posted: May 22nd, 2007, 10:52 am
by MissGoddess
I just wanted to comment that I'm happy the "couple" is back on board---I like them much better than the generic film reels image. :)

Posted: May 22nd, 2007, 10:58 am
by Dewey1960
>I'm happy the "couple" is back on board...

You mean Chet and Connie?

Posted: May 22nd, 2007, 12:15 pm
by MissGoddess
Dewey1960 wrote:>I'm happy the "couple" is back on board...

You mean Chet and Connie?
They have names! Those actually fit them perfectly.

Posted: May 29th, 2007, 7:14 am
by cmvgor
uh, I think I'm here. Did I make it?

Posted: May 29th, 2007, 7:54 am
by SSO Admins
cmvgor wrote:uh, I think I'm here. Did I make it?
You did indeed.

Posted: May 29th, 2007, 8:23 am
by cmvgor
Whew!

Posted: May 29th, 2007, 8:33 am
by jdb1
MissGoddess wrote:
Dewey1960 wrote:>I'm happy the "couple" is back on board...

You mean Chet and Connie?
They have names! Those actually fit them perfectly.
Which is which? In these days of Madisons, Taylors and Elliotts, we can't take anything for granted. I recall that one of the daughters of Danny DeVito and Rhea Pearlman is called Lucy Chet DeVito.

I've noticed that the current trend in salutations in a business letter is to use the addressee's entire name, so as not to insult a man by using "Ms." or a woman by using "Mr." - e.g., "Dear Elliott Smith," or "Dear Madison Grainger."

Posted: May 31st, 2007, 6:16 pm
by SSO Admins
If you've found this, you've probably figured out that I moved this and the forum outage thread here and deleted those forums. Just trying to keep things neat.