Colt .45 (1950)

User avatar
moira finnie
Administrator
Posts: 8024
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 6:34 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Colt .45 (1950)

Post by moira finnie »

Thanks to you guys for the heads up on the Randolph Scott westerns being broadcast on his birthday a few weeks ago I was able to record only two of them, but they were corkers...here's some random thoughts on the first one I've seen...

This brightly colored Edwin L. Marin directed movie, which might easily have been called Gun Crazy (Western Style), has recently been broadcast several times on Encore Western Channel and is available on dvd.

Colt .45 begins with the legend scrolling across the screen explaining that 'A gun, like any other source of power, is a force for either good or evil, being neither in itself, but dependent upon those who possess it.' In other words, it's the NRA's kind of movie!
Image
This highly colored oater, which I tend to think of as lensed in "Luridcolor", not Technicolor, by veteran Warner Brothers Western cameraman Wilfred Cline, is a lightning fast paced movie, clocking in at just over an hour. It was great, illogical fun from the git-go, with our Randy as a salesman for the Colt Firearms Company in 1851, who begins the movie in the office of the local sheriff extolling the virtues of the "finest guns ever made. Here's law and order in six-finger doses. Yes, sir, easy to load and as durable as your mother-in-law."
Image
Before you can scratch your head and say "mother-in-law jokes in the Old West?", and wonder how he can be hawking these shootin' irons 20 years before their initial manufacture in what is laughingly known as the real world, our favorite salesman is implicated in the jailbreak of an ornery sidewinder named "Jason Brett" (delightfully overplayed to a faretheewell by that über-bad apple, Monty Beragon himself, aka Zachary Scott--no relation to Randolph, unfortunately). Hmmm, with both guys with the same last name on the set, it must have been a tad confusing.
Image
Zach plays his role with such zest and abandon, that one wonders if it was despair over his near total typecasting as a well dressed snake--usually in the moral weakling division--in American directed movies, (though Renoir and Buñuel knew better).

Or perhaps, as becomes clear in one section of my recently completed reading of Christopher Plummer's autobiography, "In Spite of Myself", Zachary Scott was quite the party animal--as well as a skilled actor at a loss to find a channel for his theatrical energy in the receding world of filmdom and the theater of the late '40s & early '50s. It might be a safe bet that some of his rapscallion behavior may have leaked out onto the set of this movie, since there are scenes in which the baddie Scott rolls his eyes, never meets the eye of his confederates or his antagonists, and looks as though the hooch he is sucking down at the local saloon might have been the real thing.

One outstanding aspect of Zachary Scott's characterization is his near mystical, almost fetishistic fascination with those shiny guns he stole from Randy's sales kit, which he practically sleeps with, though he does find time to also make untoward advances on the person of Ruth Roman, who plays an honest pioneer prospector gal unhappily married to moral weakling Lloyd Bridges. Though at first he is a hostage of Zach and his gang, Lloyd B. soon becomes a confederate of Jason Brett (Zachary Scott).
Image
Zachary Scott, forcing his intentions on Ruth Roman.

Bridges, as a man who has sunk a great deal of his life savings in a godforsaken mine, is not satisfied with the simple rustic charms of a log cabin, a kerosene lamp,a meager living and the bodacious Ruth. No, Lloyd longs "to sleep between clean sheets", to control the saloon in the nearby mining town, "where the real money is", and, as the screenplay makes increasingly clear, to follow Zachary Scott around like a lovesick puppy.

Image
Lloyd Bridges, looking for love in all the wrong places in the Old West.

Brett, (Zachary Scott) whose sadism has become increasingly out of control as he learns to use his guns for target practice on unarmed Indians, blast anyone who gets in his way, and to pistol whip his cowed minions, urging them "to have a drink and grow a spine", is not averse to listening to the unbalanced Bridges' wilder schemes, appropriating the more useful and coherent ideas. However, it soon becomes clear that conscience-ridden Ruth Roman won't be going along for this ride with her hubby on his fast trip to h-e-double hockey sticks. As the power that Zachary Scott acquires becomes more grandiose, it is also obvious that this Dracula-Renfrew relationship between the bandit and his follower has no where to go. Once again, Lloyd Bridges' slavish pretensions, first to his wife, and now to Brett, have led him to ruin. Shoulda stuck to prospectin', Lloyd.

One of the aspects of this movie that seemed so different from most earlier Randolph Scott westerns and Warner Brothers westerns in general was the new level of violence that accompanied this movie.
In some ways, it seems as though the baroque violence of late '40s gangster movies such as White Heat seeped into the western as well. So, we see bullets entering bodies and arrows piercing flesh in new and, frankly, often unwelcome ways. While violence certainly can have a point in some movies, this facetious exercise in rip roarin' adventure isn't really one of them. We not only have obviously painful gunshot wounds, closeups of Zachary Scott digging his nails into a wound on Randolph Scott, but there is a film noir twist to almost every act of violence.

One of the more hilariously inappropriate moments of mayhem comes when Alan Hale, as a corrupt sheriff in cahoots with Zachary Scott, is shot with an arrow by the Indians trying to help Randy. Since we're talking about one of the more beloved character actors of the 20th Century, Hale is slowed but not downed by this arrow, which is in the chest. Near his heart. And clearly fatal--but...you can't keep a good ham down.
Image
A hearty looking Alan Hale, Sr. earlier in his storied career.

Sheriff Hale, who, in reality looks sadly bloated and unhealthy in this movie, staggers and crawls all the way from some rocky arroyo where he was hit back to town--a distance of at least 20 miles, I'd say. Now, he's on foot, but he makes it in the nick of time to warn Zach and company that Randolph Scott is on his way, with Ruth Roman. Ruth, btw, has a shoulder wound that allows the audience to get a nice glimpse of her upper back, though she's still able to clunk Randy cold after he tells her she can't come with him to take back the town, hop on a horse, and--oh, yes--don a white buckskin leather bolero jacket from the helpful Indians, which should make her an easy target as she dashes back to town.

Image

Ruth displays considerable feistiness throughout this flick, and probably should have done more westerns, though her dark sultriness seemed to doom her to being a minor league Linda Darnell for much of her career, when she wasn't being miscast in Alfred Hitchcock movies.
Image

In case you wondered what the heck happened to Randolph Scott while all this was going on, he was around the periphery of this movie, making friends with Indian Chief Walking Bear (played by the dignified Chief Thundercloud, who had played Tonto in a couple of Lone Ranger serials in the late '30s), having heart-to-heart talks with the law and Ruth Roman while trying to clear his name, and eventually rousing a passive populace into forming some sort of opposition to Zachary Scott's Mr. Big Shot. Randolph Scott doesn't really get into the heart of the action until the final scenes, when Randy, his Indian pals and a few citizens help to stop the Other Scott. Oddly, there is a clinch at the end of the movie between Randolph Scott & Ruth Roman, though I saw no indication of a romantic spark between the two of them earlier in the movie.

Image
I would like to mention my fondness for much of the work of the director of this movie, Edwin Marin, (above), a journeyman at MGM's B movie unit, who directed some of the bouncier Philo Vance and Maisie movie series entries, as well as the 1938 version of A Christmas Carol, had a career that went back to the early talkie era. He also directed a movie that was new to me recently, a charmer with Jean Parker called Sequoia (1934), about a cougar and a deer growing up together in a forest with some exceptionally good nature photography in the studio and the great outdoors.
Image
Director Edwin L Marin (the seated dark man on the right with the script and mustache), discussing a scene in The Casino Murder Case (1935) with actors Paul Lukas, seated, Leslie Fenton, (standing), Isabel Jewell, (seated), and Rosalind Russell, (standing with the cigarette in the white evening gown).

Marin even worked well with George Raft several times, getting good performances out of the king of the underplayers in the nifty Johnny Angel and Nocturne. Mr. Marin is apparently at his best in Westerns, and made one of John Wayne and Ella Raines' more enjoyable movies, Tall in the Saddle (1944), (too bad Wayne and Raines didn't work together more often). Prior to his death in 1951, Marin made nine movies--seven of them Westerns--with Randolph Scott from 1941-1951. Colt .45 was the next to the last movie of Marin's career, to be followed by Fort Worth.

Next week: Fort Worth (1951) featuring Randolph Scott vs. the multi-talented David Brian!
Last edited by moira finnie on February 17th, 2009, 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Avatar: Frank McHugh (1898-1981)

The Skeins
TCM Movie Morlocks
klondike

Post by klondike »

Two Scotts in one post-war Western!!! :shock:
Man, how did I miss that one?! :x
Holy O'MacKinaw, I'm in for it from the Ancestors now! :cry:
Maybe I can get the MacIntyre side to cover for me . . . . :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
movieman1957
Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: April 15th, 2007, 3:50 pm
Location: MD

Post by movieman1957 »

Ruth Roman also displays condsiderable "leg" in that shot too. Thanks for your post and sorry I missed the movie. I have "Cariboo Trail" laying around to see but neither of the two you mentioned.
Chris

"Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana."
klondike

Post by klondike »

movieman1957 wrote: I have "Cariboo Trail" laying around to see but neither of the two you mentioned.
Cariboo Trail is a very atypical 'northern' that makes believe it's a light 'n breezy oat-bag potboiler so it can sneak-up on the viewer when his/her attention wavers, and then get all dark & gritty, kinda like a Roy Rogers movie rewritten for Anthony Mann.

slight spoiler alert * * * *


As an example, Randy decides to amputate his sidekick's arm (for his own darn good), and then collects all sorts of hateful abuse for his samaritan act by trying to make ol' Lefty like him again . .
User avatar
movieman1957
Administrator
Posts: 5522
Joined: April 15th, 2007, 3:50 pm
Location: MD

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by movieman1957 »

For those interested in this afternoon's showing I thought Moira's comments might be appropriate.
Chris

"Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana."
User avatar
MissGoddess
Posts: 5072
Joined: April 17th, 2007, 10:01 am
Contact:

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by MissGoddess »

He also directed a movie that was new to me recently, a charmer with Jean Parker called Sequoia (1934), about a cougar and a deer growing up together in a forest with some exceptionally good nature photography in the studio and the great outdoors.


Moira, do you know if this movie is on DVD or was it on TCM? I'd love to see it.
"There's only one thing that can kill the movies, and that's education."
-- Will Rogers
User avatar
MissGoddess
Posts: 5072
Joined: April 17th, 2007, 10:01 am
Contact:

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by MissGoddess »

Moira,

The big thing that strikes me from your review are the similarities to another western made the same year and also named after a famous repeater of the old west, Anthony Mann's Winchester '73. Both feature colorful bad guys (Zachary Scott/Dan Duryea) who have weak willed minions (Lloyd Bridges/Charles Drake) that are hooked up with less than satisfied ladies (Ruth Roman/Shelley Winters).
"There's only one thing that can kill the movies, and that's education."
-- Will Rogers
User avatar
moira finnie
Administrator
Posts: 8024
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 6:34 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by moira finnie »

MissGoddess wrote:Moira,

The big thing that strikes me from your review are the similarities to another western made the same year and also named after a famous repeater of the old west, Anthony Mann's Winchester '73. Both feature colorful bad guys (Zachary Scott/Dan Duryea) who have weak willed minions (Lloyd Bridges/Charles Drake) that are hooked up with less than satisfied ladies (Ruth Roman/Shelley Winters).
Well...yeah, those are really good points, Miss G., and I'm sure that the actors in Colt .45 sure would have been cheered up to have their little story compared to the classic tragedy at the heart of Winchester '73. Comparing that movie to Colt .45 is like contrasting a production of Euripides with a Neil Simon play. Sure, both have subtexts, both have similar types floating around a ramshackle plot line, but one is geared to a good time for all without too much introspection--but lots of stretching of the Production Code restrictions on the depiction of violence. The Mann film is a much deeper examination of the way that hate and vengeance can twist a human being into something less than an animal. There were certainly similar elements in both--but they sure were mixed differently.

What you have pointed out highlights one of the fascinating things about a potent genre like the Western: How the same archetypes and plot lines can be presented so differently by various filmmakers.

Truthfully, I'd much rather have Ruth Roman next to me in a buckboard running away from certain death than Shelley Winters! :wink:
Avatar: Frank McHugh (1898-1981)

The Skeins
TCM Movie Morlocks
User avatar
MissGoddess
Posts: 5072
Joined: April 17th, 2007, 10:01 am
Contact:

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by MissGoddess »

hahaaaa!! I only saw about 15 minutes of Colt .45...the part where Ruth blew up the shack she was inside...I still wish I knew how she survived that and walked out without so much as a smudge on her nose! I bet Wyle E. Coyote could have learned a thing or two about explosives from her. :D
"There's only one thing that can kill the movies, and that's education."
-- Will Rogers
User avatar
Rita Hayworth
Posts: 10068
Joined: February 6th, 2011, 4:01 pm

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by Rita Hayworth »

Having seen both Colt 45 and Winchester 73 ... I feel that Winchester 73 was better all around than Colt 45 because the story was more believable and realistic to me. I have nothing against Randolph Scott in Colt 45 ... but James Stewart is by far the better actor than Scott. Being hard of hearing ... the dialogue in Colt 45 to me is less favorable than Winchester 73.

My beef against Westerns is the dialogue and the dialogue and script of the movie is poor and difficult to follow along ... I will not watch it. When, I first saw Colt 45 ... I did not care for it ( that is when I was young back then, and I did not care for Randolph Scott as an actor ) ... but many years later ... ( hearing aids improvements ) ... I find it more enjoyable to watch but still not as good as Winchester 73 because James Stewart and Company were better than Randolph Scott and Company.

i had to read this thread about 3 to 4 times before I started sharing my opinions of the two movies here. Personally, I find both movies equally entertaining but the acting in one movie is better than the other. That's the big difference maker.

Winchester 73 gets 3.5 stars out of 5
Colt 45 gets 2.5 stars out of 5
RedRiver
Posts: 4200
Joined: July 28th, 2011, 9:42 am

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by RedRiver »

COLT 45 is a cute little adventure. I have a DVD that features this film, FORT WORTH and one other. COLT 45 is the best by a margin. As Moira mentioned, the color is striking. It looks particularly good on a new DVD.
User avatar
mrsl
Posts: 4200
Joined: April 14th, 2007, 5:20 pm
Location: Chicago SW suburbs

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by mrsl »

.
Moira:

I had been watching Randy movies since early, early in the a.m. so by the time Colt 45 came on, I was able to tear my eyes away from him and look at the other folks on screen :lol: The reason I said that is because if you watch Ruth earlier in the movie, she starts watching Randy with a kind of knowing look in her eye. If you ever see it again, even if you don't watch the whole movie, try to catch the part when they are both in the Indian camp, in the tepee and see how she's looking at him when he is busy with other things. The interested look is definitely there and grows from then on to the end of the film.
.
Anne


***********************************************************************
* * * * * * * * What is past is prologue. * * * * * * * *

]***********************************************************************
User avatar
moira finnie
Administrator
Posts: 8024
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 6:34 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by moira finnie »

mrsl wrote:.
Moira:

I had been watching Randy movies since early, early in the a.m. so by the time Colt 45 came on, I was able to tear my eyes away from him and look at the other folks on screen :lol: The reason I said that is because if you watch Ruth earlier in the movie, she starts watching Randy with a kind of knowing look in her eye. If you ever see it again, even if you don't watch the whole movie, try to catch the part when they are both in the Indian camp, in the tepee and see how she's looking at him when he is busy with other things. The interested look is definitely there and grows from then on to the end of the film.
.
Oh, I agree that Ruth Roman looks at Randy with an intrigued raised eyebrow--but I just don't think that Scott lets on much except a growing respect for Ruth's moxie as the film goes on. He seemed to have more of a bond with the Native Americans who help him give Zachary Scott and his crowd a well-deserved whupping. I dunno, but that's just how I saw it (even after seeing the movie again the other day). I do wish that Ruth Roman had made better Westerns. The only other ones I've seen are Barricade, The Far Country, Dallas, and Great Day in the Morning. I liked her role in Colt .45 better than any of them--even The Far Country and Great Day in the Morning.

What seems to me to be Randolph Scott's often terse and only fleeting interest in the women in his movies is actually part of his charm for me. That--and his dry sense of humor, which crops up in almost every movie at least once or twice--and yes, I agree with other posters who have mentioned that his dulcet Virginia accent was not hard on the ears either. He didn't have great depth as an actor, and sticking to the Western genre for much of his career probably was never going to gain him any critical accolades (despite his work in Boetticher's well-made movies). Yet, what he did was done well and with a minimum of fuss.

HEY!! Has Randolph Scott every been the Star of the Month on TCM??
Avatar: Frank McHugh (1898-1981)

The Skeins
TCM Movie Morlocks
User avatar
mrsl
Posts: 4200
Joined: April 14th, 2007, 5:20 pm
Location: Chicago SW suburbs

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by mrsl »

.
Moira:

I guess I kind of almost misunderstood you, but another thing about Randy is, he NEVER, NEVER messes with another man's woman, and up to then he still considered her as Zachary's lady. The only time he took any kind of liberties with a married lady was in 7 Men From Now with Maureen O'Sullivan and by then he knew, as everyone did, that her husband was a despicable louse. And the only liberty he took was giving her a good shake and telling her to grow up and help him to help her.
.
Anne


***********************************************************************
* * * * * * * * What is past is prologue. * * * * * * * *

]***********************************************************************
User avatar
JackFavell
Posts: 11926
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 9:56 am

Re: Colt .45 (1950)

Post by JackFavell »

Randy is growing on me as an actor. I know that most people think of him as "wooden" - I was ticked off when I read this on IMDB a day or so ago, although a few years ago I might have said the same thing. I think he's just a very quiet actor, you have to look more closely to see the spark in his eye, or the changing emotions on his stoic face. They are there, and I love him for being that way. The more I watch him, the more I see in his performances.
Post Reply